We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Environmental Science/Challenges to corporate governance practices: Case study of Libyan commercial banks
PeriodicalsEnvironmental Science

Challenges to corporate governance practices: Case study of Libyan commercial banks

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

The purpose of this study is to investigate corporate governance (CG) practices in Libyan Commercial Banks (LCBs) in order to find out any essential challenges that are associated with the process of adopting CG in the LCBs which became mandatory implementation in late 2010 in Libya. This study adopts a qualitative approach by conducting semi-structured interviews to collect the required data within the framework of stakeholder and new institutional theories of CG. Five LCBs are selected as units of case studies, as well as Central Bank of Libya (CBL). The results of the findings reveal that the implementation of CG code 2010 at LCBs is still in the early stages. The weakness of supervision and absence of training, as well as a lack of knowledge and political instability; are the main challenges to LCBs in complying with good CG practices and overcoming the problems of the political economics of CG. The outcome of this study will contribute to research knowledge on CG, especially in Libyan banks, by using stakeholder and new institutional theories as a theoretical framework.

Cite this record

Hashem Iswaissi, Kazem Falahati (2017). Challenges to corporate governance practices: Case study of Libyan commercial banks. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 1(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv1i1p3

Copy in another style

Iswaissi, H., & Falahati, K. (2017). Challenges to corporate governance practices: Case study of Libyan commercial banks. Corporate Governance and Sustainability Review, 1(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgsrv1i1p3
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.