We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/General Science/Study of Seismic Response Demands of Different L-shaped Buildings
PeriodicalsGeneral Science

Study of Seismic Response Demands of Different L-shaped Buildings

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

The present study evaluates the effect of plan configuration irregularity of different L shaped models. For this, one regular and six different L-shaped RC building frames were modeled for numerical analysis. The analysis was done through an equivalent static lateral force method and response spectrum analysis (dynamic analysis). The seismic response demands were measured in terms of story displacement, inter-story drift ratio, torsional irregularity ratio, and torsional diaphragm rotation. In addition, fundamental time period of structure, vibration mode shapes and modal participating mass ratios were also studied. The study shows that the fundamental time period of structure based on standard code shows a lower value as compared to a finite element approach. It is concluded that to account for the irregularities present within the buildings, current code provisions are insufficient and should be amended.

Cite this record

Bharat Khanal, Hemchandra Chaulagain (2020). Study of Seismic Response Demands of Different L-shaped Buildings. Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.3126/hijase.v1i1.33537

Copy in another style

Khanal, B., & Chaulagain, H. (2020). Study of Seismic Response Demands of Different L-shaped Buildings. Himalayan Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 1(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.3126/hijase.v1i1.33537
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.