We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Chemistry/Metrics for Benchmarking and Uncertainty Quantification: Quality, Applicability, and a Path to Best Practices for Machine Learning in Chemistry
PeriodicalsChemistry

Metrics for Benchmarking and Uncertainty Quantification: Quality, Applicability, and a Path to Best Practices for Machine Learning in Chemistry

arXiv2020

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

This review aims to draw attention to two issues of concern when we set out to make machine learning work in the chemical and materials domain, i.e., statistical loss function metrics for the validation and benchmarking of data-derived models, and the uncertainty quantification of predictions made by them. They are often overlooked or underappreciated topics as chemists typically only have limited training in statistics. Aside from helping to assess the quality, reliability, and applicability of a given model, these metrics are also key to comparing the performance of different models and thus for developing guidelines and best practices for the successful application of machine learning in chemistry.

Cite this record

Gaurav Vishwakarma, Aditya Sonpal, Johannes Hachmann (2020). Metrics for Benchmarking and Uncertainty Quantification: Quality, Applicability, and a Path to Best Practices for Machine Learning in Chemistry. arXiv. https://library.shubhaarti.in/content/cc905fc6-7f80-4bb4-ae79-42e7786c87eb

Copy in another style

Vishwakarma, G., Sonpal, A., & Hachmann, J. (2020). Metrics for Benchmarking and Uncertainty Quantification: Quality, Applicability, and a Path to Best Practices for Machine Learning in Chemistry. arXiv. https://library.shubhaarti.in/content/cc905fc6-7f80-4bb4-ae79-42e7786c87eb
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.