We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Life Sciences/Integrative systematics with structural monophyly and ancestral signatures: Chionoloma (Bryophyta)
PeriodicalsLife Sciences

Integrative systematics with structural monophyly and ancestral signatures: Chionoloma (Bryophyta)

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

The moss genus Chionoloma (Pottiaceae, Bryophyta), recently presented in a molecular analysis as a massive genus inflated by the synonymy of several heretofore accepted genera, is deframed and reformatted to internally define minimally monophyletic genera. This resurrects from the molecular synonymy of the genera Oxystegus and Pseudosymblepharis. Morphologically determined evolutionary relationships of species are combined with molecular signatures of ancestral species to devise an integrated evolutionary classification for the group. The methods include second-order morphological Markov chains, Shannon–Turing sequential Bayes statistical support, and multi-node molecular evidence of ancestry. This study is based on data and revisionary results from the original studies by other authors and from the study of herbarium specimens of authentic material. The reframing of this portmanteau genus directly affects the apprehension of biodiversity and rescues two genera from epistemological extinction.

Cite this record

Richard H. Zander (2024). Integrative systematics with structural monophyly and ancestral signatures: Chionoloma (Bryophyta). Academia Biology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.20935/acadbiol7449

Copy in another style

Zander, R. H. (2024). Integrative systematics with structural monophyly and ancestral signatures: Chionoloma (Bryophyta). Academia Biology, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.20935/acadbiol7449
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.