We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning/Comparative Study on the Performance of the Bagging Algorithm in the Breast Cancer Dataset
PeriodicalsArtificial Intelligence & Machine Learning

Comparative Study on the Performance of the Bagging Algorithm in the Breast Cancer Dataset

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Breast cancer remains a predominant health concern globally. Early detection, powered by advancements in medical imaging and computational methods, plays a vital role in enhancing survival rates. This research delved into the application and performance of the Bagging algorithm on a Breast Cancer dataset that underwent image segmentation using the Canny method and feature extraction through Hu-Moments. The Bagging algorithm demonstrated moderately consistent performance across a 5-fold cross-validation, with average metrics of 56.9% accuracy, 58.3% precision, 57.7% recall, and 56.6% F-measure. While the results showcased the potential of the Bagging algorithm in classifying breast cancer data, there remains an avenue for further optimization and exploration of other ensemble or deep learning techniques. The findings contribute to the broader domain of machine learning in medical imaging and offer insights for future research directions and clinical diagnostic tool development.

Cite this record

Fadhila Tangguh Admojo, Bagus Satrio Waluyo Poetro (2023). Comparative Study on the Performance of the Bagging Algorithm in the Breast Cancer Dataset. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Issues, 1(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.56705/ijaimi.v1i1.87

Copy in another style

Admojo, F. T., & Poetro, B. S. W. (2023). Comparative Study on the Performance of the Bagging Algorithm in the Breast Cancer Dataset. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Issues, 1(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.56705/ijaimi.v1i1.87
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.