We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/General Science/Reduction between Categorical Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism EIO-2
PeriodicalsGeneral Science

Reduction between Categorical Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism EIO-2

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Syllogism reasoning is a common and important form of reasoning in human thinking from Aristotle onwards. To overcome the shortcomings of previous studies, this article makes full use of set theory and classical propositional logic, and deduces the remaining 23 valid syllogisms only on the basis of the syllogism EIO-2 from the perspective of mathematical structuralism, and then successfully establishes a concise formal axiom system for categorical syllogistic logic. More specifically, the article takes advantage of the trisection structure of categorical propositions such as Q(a, b), the transformation relations between an Aristotelian quantifier and its inner and outer negation, the symmetry of the two Aristotelian quantifier (that is, no and some), and some inference rules in classical propositional logic, and derives the remaining 23 valid syllogisms from the syllogism EIO-2, so as to realize the reduction between different valid categorical syllogisms.

Cite this record

Hui Li (2022). Reduction between Categorical Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism EIO-2. Applied Science and Innovative Research, 7(1), p30–p30. https://doi.org/10.22158/asir.v7n1p30

Copy in another style

Li, H. (2022). Reduction between Categorical Syllogisms Based on the Syllogism EIO-2. Applied Science and Innovative Research, 7(1), p30–p30. https://doi.org/10.22158/asir.v7n1p30
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.