We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Treatment planning study comparing proton therapy, RapidArc and IMRT for a synchronous bilateral lung cancer case
PeriodicalsMedical Sciences

Treatment planning study comparing proton therapy, RapidArc and IMRT for a synchronous bilateral lung cancer case

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to perform a treatment planning study on a synchronous bilateral non-small cell lung cancer case using three treatment modalities: uniform scanning proton therapy, RapidArc, and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Methods : The maximum intensity projection (MIP) images obtained from the 4 dimensional-computed tomography (4DCT) scans were used for delineation of tumor volumes in the left and right lungs. The average 4D-CT was used for the treatment planning among all three modalities with identical patient contouring and treatment planning goal. A proton therapy plan was generated in XiO treatment planning system (TPS) using 2 fields for each target. For a comparative purpose, IMRT and RapidArc plans were generated in Eclipse TPS. Treatment plans were generated for a total dose of 74 CGE or Gy prescribed to each planning target volume (PTV) (left and right) with 2 CGE or Gy per fraction. In IMRT and RapidArc plans, normalization was done based on PTV coverage values in proton plans. Results: The mean PTV dose deviation from the prescription dose was lower in proton plan (within 3.4%), but higher in IMRT (6.5% to 11.3%) and RapidArc (3.8% to 11.5%) plans. Proton therapy produced lower mean dose to the total lung, heart, and esophagus when compared to IMRT and RapidArc. The relative volume of the total lung receiving 20, 10, and 5 CGE or Gy (V20, V10, and V5, respectively) were lower using proton therapy than using IMRT, with absolute differences of 9.71%, 22.88%, and 39.04%, respectively. The absolute differences in the V20, V10, and V5 between proton and RapidArc plans were 4.84%, 19.16%, and 36.8%, respectively, with proton therapy producing lower dosimetric values. Conclusion : Based on the results presented in this case study, uniform scanning proton therapy has a dosimetric advantage over both IMRT and RapidArc for a synchronous bi-lateral NSCLC, especially for the normal lung tissue, heart, and esophagus sparing. Further studies on a large group of patients with bi-lateral lung cancer are required to validate the dosimetric superiority of proton therapy over the IMRT and RapidArc. ------------------------------- Cite this article as: Rana S, Pokharel S, Zheng Y, Zhao L, Risalvato D, Vargas C, Cersonsky N. Treatment planning study comparing proton therapy, RapidArc and intensity modulated radiation therapy for a synchronous bilateral lung cancer case. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 2014; 2 (2):020216. DOI: 10.14319/ijcto.0202.16

Cite this record

Suresh B. Rana, Shyam Pokharel, Yuanshui Zheng, Li Zhao, Dina Risalvato, Carlos Vargas, et al. (2014). Treatment planning study comparing proton therapy, RapidArc and IMRT for a synchronous bilateral lung cancer case. International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology, 2(2), 020216–020216. https://doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.0202.16

Copy in another style

Rana, S. B., Pokharel, S., Zheng, Y., Zhao, L., Risalvato, D., Vargas, C., & Cersonsky, N. (2014). Treatment planning study comparing proton therapy, RapidArc and IMRT for a synchronous bilateral lung cancer case. International Journal of Cancer Therapy and Oncology, 2(2), 020216–020216. https://doi.org/10.14319/ijcto.0202.16
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.