We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Biomedical Engineering/Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters
PeriodicalsBiomedical Engineering

Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

An investigation of maximal isometric cylindrical grasping actions of the hand is reported. A dynamometer is described which allows simultaneous measurement of both the normal forces and the tangential shear forces imposed by each of the three phalangeal segments of a finger during a test. Seventeen subjects were tested, grasping cylinders 31-116 mm in diameter. Normal grasp forces decreased significantly as cylinder size increased, while with large diameters, shear forces moved the skin towards the finger tip. In all cases the distal segments of the fingers imposed forces significantly larger than those of the middle and proximal segments. The mean contributions of fingers from index to little were: 30, 30, 22 and 18%, proportions that did not vary significantly for the range of grasp diameters. Forces acting during grasping activities are reported in greater detail, for a wider range of hand gripping postures, than previously available. These data are useful in the design of hand operated controls or in the prediction of tendon and joint forces in vivo for the design of implants.

Cite this record

Andrew A. Amis (1987). Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 9(4), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(87)90079-3

Copy in another style

Amis, A. A. (1987). Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 9(4), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-5425(87)90079-3
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.