We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Robotics & Automation/Evaluating Different UAS Flight Methods for 3D Model Generation and Printing of a Tornado Destroyed Cultural Heritage: Caddo House in Texas
PeriodicalsRobotics & Automation

Evaluating Different UAS Flight Methods for 3D Model Generation and Printing of a Tornado Destroyed Cultural Heritage: Caddo House in Texas

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

In recent years, the use of Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) to obtain imagery for photogrammetry has become commonplace.Using these data to develop 3D products has also grown significantly in both research and commercial applications.This study aims to find a relatively simple and low cost UAS flight method as a means to obtain data to produce a 3D model suitable for 3D printing.The study subject chosen to assess different flight methods was the Caddo House at Caddo Mounds State Historical Site located near Alto, Cherokee County, Texas, USA.To collect images for analysis, a DJI Phantom 4 Pro UAS was used with Pix4DCapture mission control app.Two main missions were carried out, one being a pre-defined double-grid flight, and the other being an orbital free-flight method.The findings of this study indicate that if the goal is to create a true-to-life 3D model of an object using UAS, the best method would be a curated orbital free-flight method.If there is time constraint and the subject is sufficiently large and not considerably irregular, a double-grid mission with sufficient forward and side overlap can produce desirable results, but with a slight loss of fine details.The 3D model developed from the curated orbital flight method was successfully printed with a customer grade FDM 3D printer.

Cite this record

Yanli L. Zhang, David L Kulhavy, Joseph Gerland, I-Kuai Hung, Daniel R. Unger, Xiaorong Wen, et al. (2023). Evaluating Different UAS Flight Methods for 3D Model Generation and Printing of a Tornado Destroyed Cultural Heritage: Caddo House in Texas. Drones and autonomous vehicles/Drones and Autonomous Vehicles, 1(1), 10003–10003. https://doi.org/10.35534/dav.2023.10003

Copy in another style

Zhang, Y. L., Kulhavy, D. L., Gerland, J., Hung, I., Unger, D. R., Wen, X., & Viegut, R. (2023). Evaluating Different UAS Flight Methods for 3D Model Generation and Printing of a Tornado Destroyed Cultural Heritage: Caddo House in Texas. Drones and autonomous vehicles/Drones and Autonomous Vehicles, 1(1), 10003–10003. https://doi.org/10.35534/dav.2023.10003
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.