We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Commerce & Accounting/A Theoretical Comparison of the Economic Impact of Large and Small Events
PeriodicalsCommerce & Accounting

A Theoretical Comparison of the Economic Impact of Large and Small Events

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

In response to the increasing debate on the relative worth of small events compared to large events, we create a theoretical model to determine whether smaller events are more likely to create positive economic impact. First, event size and city size are redefined as continuums of resources. The concepts of event resource demand (ERD) and city resource supply (CRS) are introduced, allowing for a joint analysis of supply and demand. When local economic conditions are brought into the analysis, the framework determines how a city resource deficiency or surplus affects the economic impact of an event. This resource-based approach assists public officials and event organizers in making more rational decisions for hosting events when they pursue positive economic impacts. Specifically, we find small events have a higher potential for positive economic impact and hosting multiple smaller-sized events is a better strategy than hosting a big event.

Cite this record

Nola Agha, Marijke Taks (2015). A Theoretical Comparison of the Economic Impact of Large and Small Events. International Journal of Sport Finance, 10(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862351501000301

Copy in another style

Agha, N., & Taks, M. (2015). A Theoretical Comparison of the Economic Impact of Large and Small Events. International Journal of Sport Finance, 10(3), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/155862351501000301
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.