We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Comparing the Intrinsic Performance of Clinical Concept Embeddings by Their Field of Medicine
Conference ProceedingsMedical Sciences

Comparing the Intrinsic Performance of Clinical Concept Embeddings by Their Field of Medicine

2019

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Pre-trained word embeddings are becoming increasingly popular for natural languageprocessing tasks.This includes medical applications, where embeddings are trained for clinical concepts using specific medical data.Recent work continues to improve on these embeddings.However, no one has yet sought to determine whether these embeddings work as well for one field of medicine as they do in others.In this work, we use intrinsic methods to evaluate embeddings from the various fields of medicine as defined by their ICD-9 systems.We find significant differences between fields, and motivate future work to investigate whether extrinsic tasks will follow a similar pattern.

Cite this record

John-Jose Nuñez, Giuseppe Carenini (2019). Comparing the Intrinsic Performance of Clinical Concept Embeddings by Their Field of Medicine. International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis (LOUHI). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-6202

Copy in another style

Nuñez, J., & Carenini, G. (2019). Comparing the Intrinsic Performance of Clinical Concept Embeddings by Their Field of Medicine. International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis (LOUHI). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d19-6202
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.