We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Commerce & Accounting/A review of credit risk assessment in banking — From deterministic models to probabilistic AI
PeriodicalsCommerce & Accounting

A review of credit risk assessment in banking — From deterministic models to probabilistic AI

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

This paper examines the literature on applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in assessing credit risk in banks, specifically focusing on probabilistic AI. We uncover unresolved issues and prevalent technical challenges by identifying the predominant AI and ML models employed. Furthermore, we explore potential approaches to address these challenges. The review reveals that research is increasingly exploring AI and ML models for credit risk modeling, often providing more accurate risk predictions than traditional models. Apparently, there is a predominant reliance on traditional deterministic models, highlighting an underutilization of probabilistic models that effectively handle inherent uncertainties in credit risk estimates. Furthermore, we observe that challenges such as overfitting, model interpretability, and regulatory compliance remain prevalent. This suggests significant potential for improving accuracy, reliability, and trustworthiness by increasing applications of probabilistic and generative AI, in combination with explainable AI (XAI). • Through a systematic literature review, we find that probabilistic AI models largely remain underutilized in the scientific literature. • We argue that probabilistic AI models are well-suited to address the current lack of transparent and interpretable models that comply with regulatory requirements. • We recommend that researchers conduct in-depth explorations of probabilistic models in order to more accurately capture both epistemic and aleatoric uncertainty. • This should be accompanied by further research on XAI and generative AI as means to enhance the transparency and interpretability of models.

Cite this record

André Engan, Lars Ole Hjelkrem, Morten Risstad (2026). A review of credit risk assessment in banking — From deterministic models to probabilistic AI. Finance Research Open, 2(2), 100125–100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2026.100125

Copy in another style

Engan, A., Hjelkrem, L. O., & Risstad, M. (2026). A review of credit risk assessment in banking — From deterministic models to probabilistic AI. Finance Research Open, 2(2), 100125–100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2026.100125
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.