We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Architecture & Planning/Architecture Schools and Their Relationship with Research: It''s Complicated
PeriodicalsArchitecture & Planning

Architecture Schools and Their Relationship with Research: It''s Complicated

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Editorial Summary In »Architecture Schools and Their Relationship with Research: It’s Complicated«, Jan Silberberger describes the problematic divide between practicing architects that teach design at architecture schools and scholars investigating the practices of designing from a theoretical or social scientific perspective. Identifying three recurrent misunderstandings between these two groups, he stresses the lack of awareness about genuine research approaches within the discipline of architecture. Emphasizing the interconnectivity of research and practice, Silberberger highlights the potential for further development of the discipline that thorough reflections on the methodologies applied in architectural design afford. [Katharina Voigt]

Cite this record

Jan Silberberger (2021). Architecture Schools and Their Relationship with Research: It''s Complicated. Dimensions Journal of Architectural Knowledge, 0(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.14361/dak-2021-0110

Copy in another style

Silberberger, J. (2021). Architecture Schools and Their Relationship with Research: It''s Complicated. Dimensions Journal of Architectural Knowledge, 0(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.14361/dak-2021-0110
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.