We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Association of mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width with coronary collateral development in stable coronary artery disease
PeriodicalsMedical Sciences

Association of mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width with coronary collateral development in stable coronary artery disease

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Introduction: The prognostic value of hematological indices in cardiovascular diseases and the association between these parameters and cardiovascular conditions have been established in the literature. Aim:In this study, we aimed to investigate the relation of mean platelet volume (MPV), MPV to platelet ratio (MPR) and red cell distribution width (RDW) with degree of coronary collateral development (CCD) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects with established critical coronary artery stenosis.Material and methods: A total of 306 patients with stable angina pectoris undergoing coronary arteriography were enrolled and divided on the basis of the development of CCD into two groups: a group with adequate CCD (n = 214) and a group with impaired CCD (n = 92).Routine complete blood count and biochemical parameters were measured before coronary arteriography.Results: The MPV and MPR levels were significantly higher in the inadequate CCD group (10.5 ±1.8 fl vs. 8.7 ±1.9 fl, p < 0.001 and 0.06 ±0.08 vs. 0.05 ±0.07, p = 0.036).Patients with inadequate CCD had significantly higher RDW levels compared to patients with adequate CCD (15.5 ±1.7% vs. 15.0 ±1.9%, p = 0.01).MPV and RDW were significantly associated with Rentrop collateral grading (r = -0.523,p < 0.001 and r = -0.239,p < 0.001, respectively), whereas the association with MPR was not significant.An MPV value greater than 9.95 fl, determined with ROC curve analysis, had 71% sensitivity and 70% specificity in predicting inadequate CCD.An RDW greater than 14.3% has 71% sensitivity and 53% specificity in selecting patients with adequate CCD.Conclusions: The present study suggests that MPV and MPR may be associated with the degree of collateral development in chronic stable CAD.However, the negative association of RDW with inadequate CCD, in combination with previous contradictory reports, raises a doubt about the possible value of RDW in stable CAD.Although these parameters may be affected by various conditions, a high MPV may lead clinicians to suspect possible inadequate collateral development in stable CAD patients.Key words: mean platelet volume, coronary collateral development, coronary artery disease, red cell distribution width, mean platelet volume to platelet ratio. S u m m a r yIn this study, we aimed to investigate the relation of mean platelet volume (MPV), MPV to platelet ratio (MPR) and red cell distribution width (RDW) with degree of coronary collateral development (CCD) in stable coronary artery disease (CAD) subjects with established critical coronary artery stenosis.The present study suggests that MPV and MPR may be associated with the degree of collateral development in chronic stable CAD.However, the negative association of RDW with inadequate CCD, in combination with previous contradictory reports.

Cite this record

İsa Sıncer, Yılmaz Güneş, Aslı Kurtar Mansıroğlu, Mehmet Coşgun, Gülali Aktaş (2018). Association of mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width with coronary collateral development in stable coronary artery disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology, 14(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78329

Copy in another style

Sıncer, İ., Güneş, Y., Mansıroğlu, A. K., Coşgun, M., & Aktaş, G. (2018). Association of mean platelet volume and red blood cell distribution width with coronary collateral development in stable coronary artery disease. Advances in Interventional Cardiology, 14(3), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.5114/aic.2018.78329
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.