We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Computer Science & Information Technology/Critical Success Factors for an Effective Security Risk Management Program
PeriodicalsComputer Science & Information Technology

Critical Success Factors for an Effective Security Risk Management Program

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

This paper evaluates the perceived effectiveness of the security risk management (SRM) programs at two Fortune 500 firms using qualitative and quantitative methods. Layers of management and staff from both firms participated in the study. Perceived effectiveness of their SRM programs was based on nine critical success factors (CSFs). Six initial critical success factors (CSFs): executive management support, organizational maturity, open communication, risk management stakeholders, team member empowerment, and holistic view of an organization were extracted from organizational role theory. They were confirmed and synthesized with three additional CSFs (security maintenance, corporate security strategy, and human resource development). A survey based on the CSFs was implemented at the two firms. Although both firms are Fortune 500 technology companies, their perceptions of current perceived SRM effectiveness differ significantly.

Cite this record

Humayun Zafar (2022). Critical Success Factors for an Effective Security Risk Management Program. International Journal of Systems and Software Security and Protection, 13(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsssp.315765

Copy in another style

Zafar, H. (2022). Critical Success Factors for an Effective Security Risk Management Program. International Journal of Systems and Software Security and Protection, 13(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijsssp.315765
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.