We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Analysis Results of the Regional Registry of Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Risk Factors and Chemo-Immunotherapy Issues
PeriodicalsMedical Sciences

Analysis Results of the Regional Registry of Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Risk Factors and Chemo-Immunotherapy Issues

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Background & Aims. At least one third of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are resistant to first-line therapy. R-CHOP chemo-immunotherapy does not yield acceptable results in high-risk patients. Effectiveness of options based either on increasing the dose intensity or on including auto-HSCT into the first-line therapy was not supported by the results of controlled studies. With this background the present study focuses on options, issues and failures of first-line on the basis of long-term follow-up of DLBCL patient population in the Volgograd Region. Materials & Methods. From 2004 to 2017 the population-based registry of the Hematology Department in the Volgograd Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary included all 492 primary DLBCL patients: 235 (48 %) men and 257 (52 %) women aged 18 to 88 years. Mean and median age was 59 and 61 years, respectively. CHOP therapy was administered to 206 (42 %) patients, and 223 (45 %) patients received R-CHOP. Other regimens including NHL-BFM-90 and R-DA-EPOCH were used only in 63 (13 %) patients. Second- and third-line therapies were administered to 145 (30 %) and 54 (11 %) patients, respectively. Value of the International Prognostic Index (IPI) and immunomorphologic characteristics was determined by multivariate Cox regression analysis. Pharmacoeconomic aspect of first-line therapy failures was analyzed using Markov model. Results. Improvement of DLBCL therapy effects with the use of R-CHOP chemo-immunotherapy is particularly obvious in the groups with favorable and intermediate prognosis with 5-year overall survival (OS) of 90 % and 69 %, respectively. R-CHOP results are not considered to be satisfactory in the high-risk group: 5-year OS was 38 %. Pharmacoeconomic analysis proves the advantage of chemo-immunotherapy strategy in comparison with the period before rituximab era in terms of the life years gained (LYG) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). With respect to immunotherapy effects the most significant immunomorphologic parameter is bcl-2 tumor cell expression. In the group of patients with bcl-2 > 50 % 5-year OS was 61 % with median of 88 months, event-free survival (EFS) was 52 % with median of 62 months. In the group without bcl-2 expression above the threshold 5-year OS and EFS were 88 % and 75 %, respectively, medians were not achieved. With c-myc and bcl-2 coexpression EFS and OS appeared to be even worse: 5-year EFS was 29 % with median of 6 months, and 5-year OS was 31 % with median of 15 months. Conclusion. The analysis of actual practice demonstrates the need for new options of first-line therapy for DLBCL high-risk patients and also for introducing new discriminating prognostic factors which include the IPI-independent ones.

Cite this record

Kamil’ Daniyalovich Kaplanov, Nikita P. Volkov, T.Yu. Klitochenko, I. V. Matveeva, A.L. Shipaeva, M.N. Shirokova, et al. (2019). Analysis Results of the Regional Registry of Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Risk Factors and Chemo-Immunotherapy Issues. Clinical oncohematology, 12(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.21320/2500-2139-2019-12-2-154-164

Copy in another style

Kaplanov, K. D., Volkov, N. P., Klitochenko, T., Matveeva, I. V., Shipaeva, A., Shirokova, M., Davydova, N. V., & Сабирова, Т. М. (2019). Analysis Results of the Regional Registry of Patients with Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma: Risk Factors and Chemo-Immunotherapy Issues. Clinical oncohematology, 12(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.21320/2500-2139-2019-12-2-154-164
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.