We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Theoretical basis for classical methods of motor rehabilitation in neurology

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Authors review the milestones of the historical formation of various theories of motor control, from the reflex to the system model. These theories form the basis forь the methods and approaches of motor rehabilitation of patients with neurological diseases and injuries. The task-oriented approach, based on systemic theories of motor control, is now generally accepted. One of its main fundamentals is the dependence of movement on parameters and conditions of the motor under performance. Rehabilitation methods and approaches presented in this paper are not mutually exclusive, but supportive. This is the reason why the study of effectiveness of a particular rehabilitation method does not always yield valuable results. Various rehabilitation methods and approaches should be combined in the treatment of neurological patients. Moreover, relative contribution of individual methods into the rehabilitation of each patient may vary depending on the safety of his or her motor functions and many other factors that are to be taken into account when planning rehabilitative activities.

Cite this record

Ksenia Ivanovna Ustinova, Ludmila A. Chernikova, Anastasia E. Khizhnikova, Alexandra G. Poydasheva, Natalia A. Suponeva, Т. М. Сабирова (2018). Theoretical basis for classical methods of motor rehabilitation in neurology. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.25692/acen.2018.3.7

Copy in another style

Ustinova, K. I., Chernikova, L. A., Khizhnikova, A. E., Poydasheva, A. G., Suponeva, N. A., & Сабирова, Т. М. (2018). Theoretical basis for classical methods of motor rehabilitation in neurology. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.25692/acen.2018.3.7
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.