We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Computer Science & Information Technology/Performance Study of N-grams in the Analysis of Sentiments
PeriodicalsComputer Science & Information Technology

Performance Study of N-grams in the Analysis of Sentiments

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

In this work, a study investigation was carried out using n-grams to classify sentiments with different machine learning and deep learning methods. We used this approach, which combines existing techniques, with the problem of predicting sequence tags to understand the advantages and problems confronted with using unigrams, bigrams and trigrams to analyse economic texts. Our study aims to fill the gap by evaluating the performance of these n-grams features on different texts in the economic domain using nine sentiment analysis techniques and found more insights. We show that by comparing the performance of these features on different datasets and using multiple learning techniques, we extracted useful intelligence. The evaluation involves assessing the precision, recall, f1-score and accuracy of the function output of the several machine learning algorithms proposed. The methods were tested using Amazon, IMDB, Reuters, and Yelp economic review datasets and our comprehensive experiment shows the effectiveness of n-grams in the analysis of sentiments.

Cite this record

Olumide Ebenezer Ojo, Alexander F. Gelbukh, Hiram Calvo, Olaronke Oluwayemisi Adebanji (2021). Performance Study of N-grams in the Analysis of Sentiments. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2021.201

Copy in another style

Ojo, O. E., Gelbukh, A. F., Calvo, H., & Adebanji, O. O. (2021). Performance Study of N-grams in the Analysis of Sentiments. Journal of the Nigerian Society of Physical Sciences, 477–483. https://doi.org/10.46481/jnsps.2021.201
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.