We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Medical Sciences/Comparison of survival time of Hawley and Vacuum-formed retainers in orthhodontic patients– a randomized clinical trial
PeriodicalsMedical Sciences

Comparison of survival time of Hawley and Vacuum-formed retainers in orthhodontic patients– a randomized clinical trial

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Background: Maintaining the results of orthodontic treatment and keeping the teeth in the corrected position is a great challenge in orthodontics. This study aimed to compare the survival time of three types of retainers including Hawley, 1-mm Vacuum-Formed (VF), and 1.5-mm VF within 6-month period. Methods: In this randomized clinical study, 152 patients were allocated into three groups to receive one type of the retainers. They were visited 1, 3, and 6 months after retainer delivery and checked for breakage, loss, local perforation, and discoloration from the patient's and clinician's point of view as indicators of failure. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used as appropriated. Result: The results revealed that breakage was among the main reasons of failure of retainers within 6 months, which was statistically significantly different between Hawley and VF retainers, as well as between 1-mm and 1.5-mm VF retainers in the three intervals (p<0.05). Concerning the loss of retainer and discoloration from the clinician's point of view, there was no significant difference between the retainers in any interval (p>0.05). Assessing the discoloration from the patient's point of view revealed statistically significant differences between Hawley and VF retainers within the first month; however, the difference was not significant at the third and sixth months (p<0.05). The difference between the two thicknesses of VF retainer was not significant in any interval (p>0.05). By the end of the sixth month, some of the VF retainers had perforation; while, perforation was not observed in Hawley retainers.Conclusion: Considering the higher breakage rate of 1-mm VF, 1.5-mm VF seems the retainer if choice.Key words: survival time; retainer; Hawley retainer; Vacuum-formed retainer;

Cite this record

Seyed Hossein Moslemzadeh, Aydin Sohrabi, Ali Rafighi, Morteza Ghojazadeh, Somaieh Rahmanian (2017). Comparison of survival time of Hawley and Vacuum-formed retainers in orthhodontic patients– a randomized clinical trial. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine, 5(1), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.abcmed.17.05.01.02

Copy in another style

Moslemzadeh, S. H., Sohrabi, A., Rafighi, A., Ghojazadeh, M., & Rahmanian, S. (2017). Comparison of survival time of Hawley and Vacuum-formed retainers in orthhodontic patients– a randomized clinical trial. Advances in Bioscience and Clinical Medicine, 5(1), 7–7. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.abcmed.17.05.01.02
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.