We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Computer Science & Information Technology/ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition
PeriodicalsComputer Science & Information Technology

ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

A framework is presented that assists requirements engineers in choosing methods for requirements acquisition. Practitioners are often unaware of the range of methods available. Even when practitioners are aware, most do not foresee the need to use several methods to acquire complete and accurate requirements. One reason for this is the lack of guidelines for method selection. The ACRE framework sets out to overcome these limitations. Method selection is achieved using questions driven from a set of facets which define the strengths and weaknesses of each method. The framework provides guidelines for requirements engineering practitioners. It has undergone evaluation through its presentation to highly experienced requirements engineers. Some results from this evaluation have been incorporated into the presented version of ACRE.

Cite this record

Neil Maiden, Gordon Rugg (1996). ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3), 183–183. https://doi.org/10.1049/sej.1996.0024

Copy in another style

Maiden, N., & Rugg, G. (1996). ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition. Software Engineering Journal, 11(3), 183–183. https://doi.org/10.1049/sej.1996.0024
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.