We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Computer Science & Information Technology/IMPACT OF SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE ON EMPLOYEE TASK PERFORMANCE AND OCB; MEDIATING ROLE OF SELF EFFICACY, MODERATING ROLE OF COLLECTIVIST CULTURE OF PAKISTAN
PeriodicalsComputer Science & Information Technology

IMPACT OF SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE ON EMPLOYEE TASK PERFORMANCE AND OCB; MEDIATING ROLE OF SELF EFFICACY, MODERATING ROLE OF COLLECTIVIST CULTURE OF PAKISTAN

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

The current study aimed to explore the impact of spiritual intelligence in the task performance and OCB, through the mediating mechanism of self efficacy and the moderating impact of collectivist culture on the said relationship. Three separate linear regression models were developed to investigate the hypotheses. The data were collected using survey method from 313 doctors, employed in both public and private sector hospitals. The findings of the study suggested that spiritual intelligence leads to the increased task performance and enhanced OCB among doctors, whereas, self efficacy partially mediates the relationship. Moreover, collectivism positively moderates the relationship of spiritual intelligence with performance and OCB. The study concludes by discussing limitations and providing future research directions.

Cite this record

Shazia Faiz Khawaja (2017). IMPACT OF SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE ON EMPLOYEE TASK PERFORMANCE AND OCB; MEDIATING ROLE OF SELF EFFICACY, MODERATING ROLE OF COLLECTIVIST CULTURE OF PAKISTAN. Jinnah Business Review, 5(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.53369/geth6821

Copy in another style

Khawaja, S. F. (2017). IMPACT OF SPIRITUAL INTELLIGENCE ON EMPLOYEE TASK PERFORMANCE AND OCB; MEDIATING ROLE OF SELF EFFICACY, MODERATING ROLE OF COLLECTIVIST CULTURE OF PAKISTAN. Jinnah Business Review, 5(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.53369/geth6821
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.