We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Electronics & Telecommunication Engineering/Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design
PeriodicalsElectronics & Telecommunication Engineering

Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Purpose: This paper sets out a framework for planning co-design processes for complex sys-tems-based projects typical in healthcare settings. Background: Healthcare systems and environments are complex. Innovation often requires the redesign of physical spaces or objects, social processes, and the complex associated layers of ser-vice systems. Co-design is an established methodology for catalysing innovation in products and services because the scope is often well-defined but can be more challenging when working in sys-tems where complexity impacts boundary definition. Co-design uses interdisciplinary and mul-ti-level engagement with diverse stakeholders to catalyse innovation at the intersection between disciplines, experiences, and knowledge sets. The evaluation of these processes often utilises con-trol over decision-making as a defacto measure of participation quality, reflecting potential for stakeholders to influence key outcomes. Yet there are also practical and theoretical reasons to val-ue well-designed participatory processes in their own right. Methods: The framework presented in this paper combines the evaluation of participation in co-design processes and in decision-making as two distinctive activities, applied to real-world and hypothetical case studies that demonstrate the potential of this framework as a transparent plan-ning and evaluation tool. Results: The framework allows participation to be planned and valued independently without defaulting to control over decision-making processes as the (only) valued option. The case studies demonstrate its potential in structuring a range of collaborative processes that suit different types of system innovation. Conclusions: The formalisation of a framework for planning co-design activities that values participation in co-design processes in parallel with participation in decision-making provides a more transparent and beneficial way to structure co-design for complex systems-based challenges that recognises the humans at the heart of co-design.

Cite this record

Aaron Davis, Niki Wallace, Ian Gwilt, Michelle R. Tuckey (2022). Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design. The Evolving Scholar. https://doi.org/10.24404/621cb2143aa4c8889c8a79ed

Copy in another style

Davis, A., Wallace, N., Gwilt, I., & Tuckey, M. R. (2022). Valuing Processes and Outcomes: A framework for planning co-design in complex systems of health design. The Evolving Scholar. https://doi.org/10.24404/621cb2143aa4c8889c8a79ed
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.