We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
PeriodicalsComputer Science & Information Technology

Understanding Scientific Inquiry

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Science is a process of inquiry: a process of asking and answering questions. However, a good question is more than an interrogatory, and a good answer is more than information: there are logical constraints that dictate when a question is answerable and what qualifies as an answer. This paper will provide an understanding of (1) when a question is answerable, (2) when a question is not ready to be asked, (3) when a question is trivial, (4) what is required for a response to be an answer, and (5) what sequence of inquiry is required to identify an answer. Equipped with this understanding, a scientist can better determine an appropriate sequence of study for a research program as well as identify the necessary arguments to warrant claims of understanding, funding, and the publication of research findings.

Cite this record

Peter J. Veazie (2018). Understanding Scientific Inquiry. Science & philosophy. https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v6i2.437

Copy in another style

Veazie, P. J. (2018). Understanding Scientific Inquiry. Science & philosophy. https://doi.org/10.23756/sp.v6i2.437
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.