We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Software Engineering/Choosing your weapons: On sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research
Conference ProceedingsSoftware Engineering

Choosing your weapons: On sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research

2015

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

Recent years have seen an increasing attention to social aspects of software engineering, including studies of emotions and sentiments experienced and expressed by the software developers. Most of these studies reuse existing sentiment analysis tools such as SentiStrength and NLTK. However, these tools have been trained on product reviews and movie reviews and, therefore, their results might not be applicable in the software engineering domain. In this paper we study whether the sentiment analysis tools agree with the sentiment recognized by human evaluators (as reported in an earlier study) as well as with each other. Furthermore, we evaluate the impact of the choice of a sentiment analysis tool on software engineering studies by conducting a simple study of differences in issue resolution times for positive, negative and neutral texts. We repeat the study for seven datasets (issue trackers and Stack Overflow questions) and different sentiment analysis tools and observe that the disagreement between the tools can lead to contradictory conclusions.

Cite this record

Robbert Jongeling, Subhajit Datta, Alexander Serebrenik (2015). Choosing your weapons: On sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2015.7332508

Copy in another style

Jongeling, R., Datta, S., & Serebrenik, A. (2015). Choosing your weapons: On sentiment analysis tools for software engineering research. IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). https://doi.org/10.1109/icsm.2015.7332508
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.