We use a few cookies

Essential cookies keep the library working. With your permission, we'd also like to use analytics to see what's useful and improve the experience. Read our Privacy Policy or Cookie Policy.

Skip to main content
Home/e-Resources/Mathematics/Fuzzy Logic Unmanned Air Vehicle Motion Planning
PeriodicalsMathematics

Fuzzy Logic Unmanned Air Vehicle Motion Planning

Checking your access to this record.

Abstract & Overview

There are a variety of scenarios in which the mission objectives rely on an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) being capable of maneuvering in an environment containing obstacles in which there is little prior knowledge of the surroundings. With an appropriate dynamic motion planning algorithm, UAVs would be able to maneuver in any unknown environment towards a target in real time. This paper presents a methodology for two-dimensional motion planning of a UAV using fuzzy logic. The fuzzy inference system takes information in real time about obstacles (if within the agent's sensing range) and target location and outputs a change in heading angle and speed. The FL controller was validated, and Monte Carlo testing was completed to evaluate the performance. Not only was the path traversed by the UAV often the exact path computed using an optimal method, the low failure rate makes the fuzzy logic controller (FLC) feasible for exploration. The FLC showed only a total of 3% failure rate, whereas an artificial potential field (APF) solution, a commonly used intelligent control method, had an average of 18% failure rate. These results highlighted one of the advantages of the FLC method: its adaptability to complex scenarios while maintaining low control effort.

Cite this record

Chelsea M. Sabo, Kelly De Oliveira Cohen (2012). Fuzzy Logic Unmanned Air Vehicle Motion Planning. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/989051

Copy in another style

Sabo, C. M., & Cohen, K. D. O. (2012). Fuzzy Logic Unmanned Air Vehicle Motion Planning. Advances in Fuzzy Systems, 2012, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/989051
Author names are used as deposited, so check their order before you submit.

Metadata is harvested from open-access indexes and can be incomplete. Check a citation against the published version before relying on it — see our open access & attribution policy.